It 's a little bit I want to do this post. The funny thing about is that little more than a year ago I started to comment on carpizeronove, because I felt ridiculous (not just me .. but otherwise ...) not to leave the foundry building, near my parents' house, a Carpi. Then, for professional reasons, are currently in contact with the agricultural world, and I realize that we have "thrown in the toilet" a great heritage. For example the sugar .. Luckily there is a program of rural recovery until 2013. And if in the budgets of the community began to count the "infrastructure costs" as extraordinary income?
Change is possible .... yes but has the money. Then what happens in the city? (Novi, Carpi ..), 'sti newcomers, rookies and politics ... want to teach the elderly ... mah ...
David Bolduc
Analysis:
LINK: http://carpitransizione.wordpress.com/category/citta-in-transizione/
How much land we have Carpi to eat?
February 27, 2011 One of the moments that impressed me most of the conference on Thursday with David Bochicchio Sustainable Food was one in which they related alla disponibilità del territorio carpigiano le esigenze pro-capite di suolo agricolo richieste dai diversi tipi di dieta.
Calcolando che il comune di Carpi si estende su 13.114 ettari, che ovviamente non possono essere tutti destinati e/o destinabili all’agricoltura, considerando una popolazione di 68.831 abitanti (che l’amministrazione dichiara con orgoglio in costante crescita) si possono trarre alcune conclusioni:
o La dieta basata sull’agricoltura e l’allevamento industriale richiedono circa 3.500 mq di suolo agricolo a testa, quindi a Carpi ne servirebbero 24.091 ettari; ne mancano già 10.977
o Se tutti i carpigiani seguissero una dieta ovo-latto-vegetariana, che richiede 1.400 square meters of land per person, 9,636 acres would be enough, we'd have 3,478 or more
Carpi If we all followed a vegan diet, consuming only 700 square meters of land in your tests, nor advanced to 4,818 hectares and 8,296
considerations that I raise these data are two:
1.La first, which was under discussion last night, concerns the sustainability of our food model: it is obvious that as we are accustomed to eat we need to consume the land of someone else and to get the food here.
2.La second concerns the sustainability of our consumption pattern of the territory if it ended the era of cheap oil, the era transport at low prices, if the people that we have "borrowed" the land decide to take it back ... how much arable land would remain in Carpi to continue to eat?
NDR: Marco Pignatti
.. Then:
short .... including infrastructure costs, advisers to discuss more, (a large casein ..) and various nuisance ... here it is:
.... the problem is that does not happen NULLAAAAA ......
Buldrein by r'vree
....
0 comments:
Post a Comment